What criteria are used to evaluate the success of an incident response?

The evaluation of an incident response's success is fundamentally based on several critical factors. These include adherence to established protocols, which ensure that the response aligns with pre-defined guidelines and best practices. Effectiveness of the response is another key criterion; it measures how well the teams executed their roles and whether the response mitigated the incident's impact. Lastly, the outcome for victims is crucial in assessing success, as it reflects the real-world implications of the incident response. A successful outcome indicates that the response effectively addressed the needs of those affected, leading to recovery and safety.

Other criteria, while important in specific contexts, do not provide a comprehensive assessment of incident response success. For example, the volume of media coverage may highlight public interest but does not directly measure the effectiveness of the response itself or its adherence to protocols. Community feedback is valuable but can be subjective and variable in quality, making it less reliable as an overarching measure of success compared to the concrete criteria provided. Additionally, resource availability speaks to preparedness but does not encompass the nuanced evaluation of how those resources were utilized in the actual response and the resulting outcomes for victims.